What Parkinson's patients want from treatment
Another successful public-private-patient collaboration provides new insight into what patients want from treatment. Listen to the PREFER webinar where patients in this Parkinson’s disease Project identified a new benefit they would trading off against a treatment’s burden.
On 10 April 2018, PREFER arranged a webinar on using the two threshold technique formats to elicit benefit-risk preferences for Parkinson’s Disease device attributes. The webinar is now available for viewing.
Speakers: Brett Hauber, PhD, Senior Economist, Vice President of Health Preference Assessment, RTI Health Solutions & Stephanie Christopher, Program Director, Medical Device Innovation Consortium.
Moderator: Bennett Levitan, Senior Director, Epidemiology, at Janssen R&D and one of the leaders of PREFER's methodology work.
About the project
The Medical Device Innovation Consortium (MDIC), the Michael J Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research, the Center for Devices and Radiological Health of the US Food and Drug Administration, RTI Health Solutions, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology are working together on a project to include patient preferences into clinical trials for devices to treat Parkinson’s disease. The 3-phase study is collecting data to understand how and when to include both a patients’ urgency for new treatment options and their level of acceptance for uncertainty regarding a treatment’s effect. The urgency means the severity of the disease and how many people the disease affects. The uncertainty means a bigger possibility that the treatment will not work for a patient.
Phase 1 used patient advocate, patient scientist, and regulatory consultants’ opinions to create a list of important effects of a new hypothetical device. The list included both the good and the bad effects. Researchers then asked participants to rank how much they valued the good and bad effects.
The top five good effects were increase in daily “on time”, decrease in motor symptoms, decrease in PD pain, decrease in cognitive impairment, and decrease in medication and side-effect burden. Notably, the good effect of treating Parkinson’s disease pain was only identified with patient input! This alone is a success of the project. The top four bad effects were worsening depression or anxiety, serious brain bleed, increase in 1-year mortality risk, increase in wait time for getting the new device.
In Phase 2, researchers created a survey to measure how much of each top effect a patient would accept from the new treatment. To measure this, participants answered multiple questions. Each question required choosing between the good and bad effects of a standard treatment versus the good and bad effects of the new treatment.
Initial survey results showed that the age of the participant affected how much of a good or bad effect they would accept. But complete results were not available for this PREFER webinar. Complete Phase 2 results were presented during a webinar held by MDIC on May 18th.
Phase 3 of the study will be a model developed to understand the acceptable level of evidence and uncertainty when developing clinical studies of Parkinson’s devices. Keep an eye out on the PREFER website and at MDIC.org for upcoming results from the final phase of this very successful public-private-patient collaboration in Parkinson’s disease.
By Kristin Bullok
Patient preferences for treatments to prevent Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid arthritis (or RA for short) is a chronic disease that affects the joints and causes pain, stiffness and swelling. There are a number of ongoing clinical trials of treatments to prevent the development of RA. A survey of over 2,900 people just published in the journal Rheumatology provides evidence that most people would be willing to accept at least some side effects in return for an effective preventive treatment.
What it means to receive a positive EMA qualification opinion for the PREFER framework
The PREFER project developed a framework with points to consider for methods selection. We asked the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and EUnetHTA to assess this document and issue a public qualification opinion on how useful the PREFER approach is from the regulatory and HTA perspective. In April 2022, the EMA committee responsible for human medicines, CHMP, issued a positive qualification opinion. We are now sharing lessons learned from the process and some of implications for the future.
Recommendations on how to find out what patients PREFER
On 28 April 2022 the PREFER project launched recommendations on why, when and how to assess and use patient preferences in medical product decision-making. During the launch, we presented take-home messages from the PREFER Recommendations. Missed the event? Don’t worry! A recording is now available!
PREFER presentation on patient preferences for Multiple Myeloma treatment wins ISPOR award
We are pleased to announce that Rosanne Janssens from KU Leuven won Best General Podium Research Presentation at ISPOR 2022, the annual conference for the Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR conference. The presentation was entitled PPreferences for Multiple Myeloma Treatment: A Stated Preference Survey Using Discrete Choice Experiment and Swing Weighting, presenting results from one of the PREFER project’s clinical patient preference case studies.
Webinar to discuss EMA's opinion on 9 June
The PREFER project is officially ending today, but our legacy continues! On 9 June at 16:00 CEST, we invite you to discuss the future impacts of the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) qualification opinion on our framework and points to consider for patient preference studies. The online event is open to everyone and free to attend!
Updated recommendations from the PREFER project
After receiving the positive qualification opinion from the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) committee responsible for human medicines CHMP, we updated our recommendations. The new 1_1 version was published on 30 May, with minor edits, pointing to the feedback we received.
PREFER receives a positive qualification opinion from the European Medicines Agency
The PREFER project developed a framework with points to for method selection that can be used by industry, regulators and health technology assessment bodies for how to use patient preferences as input in medical product decision making. We asked the European Medicines Agency and EUnetHTA to coordinate the assessment of our framework and its points to consider for method selection and issue a public qualification opinion on how useful the PREFER approach is from the regulatory perspective. Join us on 9 June, when we present and discuss the opinion in an online event at 16:00 CEST.
A word of acknowledgement from the coordinators
PREFER has not only accomplished everything that we set out to do in the beginning. Significant contributions to the science of bringing patient perspectives to the centre of medical decision making, with methodological rigor based on close-up stake holder input. Large clinical case studies in several disease areas and in multiple countries with innovative insights from psychology and the field of educational tools. Providing detailed recommendations for anyone wanting to set up a preference study in their organization.
The PREFER Recommendations
The PREFER project has developed recommendations for how and when it is best to perform and include patient preferences in decision making during the medical product life cycle. Supporting the development of guidelines for structured patient input into decision-making for the pharmaceutical industry, regulatory authorities, health technology assessment bodies and reimbursement agencies!
The PREFER Recommendations in brief
Want to know why, when and how PREFER recommends that pharma, regulators, HTA bodies and payers assess and use patient preferences in medical product decision-making? In time for the 28 April launch, we offer a summary of the key messages from the PREFER Recommendations!
Final PREFER webinar recording online! Patient preferences in diabetes
On 7 April, we explored the results of our diabetes patient preference study in the final instalment of the PREFER webinar series. We presented the results of a diabetes case study on patients' preferences for, and the trade-offs they make, when selecting what device to use to monitor their glucose. And discussed whether outcomes differ depending on what type of preference elicitation method is used, what kind of educational tool patients are presented with, the way patients are recruited, and patient characteristics/experiences.
Webinar on patient preferences in multiple myeloma now online!
Multiple myeloma is a cancer that forms in plasma cells, a type of white blood cells. In our 1 April 2022 webinar, we presented the results of a multiple myeloma patient preference study that aimed to understand the unmet needs, treatment outcomes and attributes (side-effects, symptoms, efficacy outcomes) that are most important to multiple myeloma patients.
Webinar recording online! Patient preferences for treatment of chronic pain
Osteoarthritis and Chronic Low Back Pain are two of the most common chronic pain conditions worldwide. To quantify patients’ perspectives on this unmet need, Pfizer and Lilly conducted a patient preference study in the US and UK. In this 10 March 2022 webinar, we describe the results of the study and the insights that contribute to the final PREFER recommendations.
Curious about what methods to use when? Recorded webinar now online!
The PREFER project case studies utilised different methods were to elicit patients' preferences. In this webinar from 8 March 2022, we share what methods to use when, for the different decision-points along the medical product life-cycle, based on criteria that were found important for methods selection and compare methods based on the obtained outcomes of the case studies.
Launching the PREFER Recommendations
On April 28 2022, the PREFER project will launch a set of recommendations for how and when it is best to perform and include patient preferences in decision making during the medical product life cycle. The recommendations are the result of a five-year effort from public and private partners. Patient stakeholders have been involved at every level of the project, co-creating a set of recommendations that can support the development of guidelines for structured patient input into decision-making for the pharmaceutical industry, regulatory authorities, health technology assessment bodies and reimbursement agencies!
Informing future preference research for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) requires long-term treatment to prevent and control disease progression. There is an increasing interest in identifying and treating ‘at risk’ individuals in order to delay or even prevent the onset of RA. But the treatment (preventive and otherwise) comes with potential side-effects. Understanding what patients and individuals at risk of RA prefer can help facilitate patient centred healthcare strategies and shared decision-making. PREFER researchers just published a systematic review to inform future preference studies in RA.
Future areas of patient preference research identified: Recorded webinar online!
We have spent the last 5 years exploring why, when and how to assess and use patient preferences in medical product decision-making. But within the constraints of a 5-year time frame and a finite number of case studies, we were not able to explore all relevant research questions. In this webinar, recorded on 7 February 2022, we review topics of future research.
PREFER at DIA Europe 2022: Enhancing patient engagement
Patient Engagement is diverse. The PREFER session at DIA Europe 2022 will approach two different facets of patient engagement, covering both to patients’ involvement beyond study participation, as research partners in designing and returning results to participants, and the interest of patients and participants to join in and/or stay in a study.
Webinar on patients’ preferences for antithrombotic treatment now online!
PREFER partners are contributing data from their own patient preference studies to the project. One of these case studies explored patient preferences for treatment following a myocardial infarction (a heart attack) and how they value the benefits and risks of antithrombotic treatment at the acute and chronic stages of heart disease. In this webinar recording from 28 January 2022, Cathy Anna Pinto & Tommi Tervonen describe the design of the study and its main results.
Watch back our webinar on patient preferences for lung cancer treatment!
One of PREFER’s core case studies explored patient preferences for lung cancer treatments, assessing which trade-offs between benefit and risks related to treatment alternatives that patients are willing to accept or not. In the recording from our 13 January webinar, we describe the design of the study, its main results, and lesson learnt in conducting the preference study with this vulnerable population of patients.
Recorded webinar on patient preferences in Rheumatoid Arthritis now online!
Rheumatoid arthritis is a long-term condition that mainly affects the joints and causes pain, swelling, stiffness and often fatigue. It is common and affects around 1% of the population. In most cases, patients begin having symptoms between 40 to 60 years of age, but it can also begin earlier, or later in life. On 2 December 2021, we organised a webinar presenting two patient preference studies focusing on treatments for rheumatoid arthritis and its prevention. The recordings are now available on YouTube.
Separate good and bad in Case 2 Best-Worst Scaling
Case 2 Best-Worst scaling, or BWS-2 for short, is one of the most popular methods for finding out what patients prefer. This is method is used to ask patients to rank different treatment attributes from best to worst. BWS-2 is a quite new method that preference researchers are still exploring. A recent PREFER study explores how the features of BWS-2 can lead to estimation problems when including both benefits and risks in scaling exercises.
Challenges and opportunities of choice modelling in health
In his dissertation, Vikas Soekhai explores different methods used to collect patients’ preferences. There is a variety of methods available. Vikas Soekhai identified 32 and has focused particularly on two of the most popular ones in his dissertation: Discrete choice experiments and what is called Case 2 best-worst scaling. All to provide insights into how best to elicit the preferences of patients.
Web-based preference studies: Why and why not?
Covid19 has resulted in the expansion of online, web-based data collection methods. These have several important advantages over face-to-face data collection. But there are several limitations to consider. A recent PREFER publication offers a comprehensive overview of both challenges and opportunities. And suggest introducing comparisons, as well as adapting to the needs of participants.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: The importance of different symptoms
Understanding how patients value different symptoms is important for the development of patient-centered therapies. One of the PREFER clinical patient preference case studies looked at how patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease value different symptoms. The results were presented in a webinar on October 27. Did you miss it? The recording is now available!
Launching the public consultation!
PREFER project has developed a framework with points to consider when selecting methods for industry, regulators and health technology assessment bodies for how to use patient preferences as input in medical product decision making. We have asked the European Medicines Agency and EUnetHTA to assess our framework and issue a public opinion on how useful our approach is from the regulatory- and health technology assessment perspective. Today, EMA published the draft opinion for public consultation! We now invite you and other stakeholders to give your input by 25 November 2021!
Curious about the PAVING study? Recorded webinar available!
Decisions about whether to approve new and emerging gene therapies are impeded by the associated uncertainties, e.g. long-term outcomes. In this complex context, the PAVING study investigated haemophilia patients’ preferences for gene therapies. Learn about how the preference study was designed, what the results were, and what the impact might be.
Lung cancer patients’ perspectives on quality of life
New treatments like immunotherapy and targeted therapy have drastically increased the number of options available to lung cancer patients and their treating physicians. But with uncertainties about their varying benefits and side-effects, there are questions to answer about their impact on patients’ health-related quality of life. PREFER researchers have investigated what patients prefer, and what matters most to them.
Missed the PREFER framework webinar? Recording now available
Incorporating patient preferences into decision-making is an important part of patient-focused drug development. The lack of a clear, practical framework for measuring patient preferences was one of stakeholders' main concerns brought up during PREFER’s initial research. On 31 August, we introduced the PREFER framework for patient preference studies, with a particular focus on points to consider for method selection and the application of preference study results to inform regulatory and HTA decision-making. The webinar was recorded, and you can now watch it in full, or the parts that interest you the most.
Patients’ preferences for gene therapy in haemophilia
For innovative treatments and treatments for rare diseases, finding a way to include the patient perspective in decision-making can be crucial. With answers from 117 people with haemophilia, PREFER researchers present their results from their clinical case study about haemophilia patients’ preferences for gene therapy. They found that patient preferences vary greatly. And that informing patients about gene therapy can facilitate acceptance.
What is a patient preference? Find out in 5 different languages!
Patients choose medical products based on preferences. But what is a patient preference? Find out in your language! More language versions are coming, but so far, we have translated our video about patient preferences to Romanian, Spanish, Catalan, Greek, and French!
Learn about PREFER in 5 different languages!
Drugs are made for patients. And patients speak different languages. We have five new language versions of our project video! Speak Spanish, Italian, Slovakian, French, or Catalan? Learn about PREFER in your language!
Curious about the PREFER research agenda? Recorded webinar available!
On 1 July, we held a webinar presenting the PREFER research agenda and how it was developed using a series of qualitative and quantitative assessments and engaging stakeholders in planning, execution, and/or evaluation of patient preference research across the medical product lifecycle. The result of these assessments was a list of methodological questions of concern to these stakeholders. These questions were then used to guide the design of cases studies in PREFER, used to inform recommendations for designing and conducting patient preference research. In the process, we also identified the methodological questions PREFER will not be able to answer.
Patient preferences for multiple myeloma treatment
Both new treatments being developed and existing treatment options available to multiple myeloma patients are associated with uncertainties. There are many unanswered questions, especially regarding the long-term efficacy and side effects of these treatments. But we don’t yet know which of the unanswered questions are most important to patients. PREFER researchers have found out what patients think matters most. They share their findings in a recent Frontiers in Medicine publication.
Missed our patient involvement webinar? Recording now available!
Patients are key in the success of patient preference studies. In our webinar on 11 June, we discussed the role of patients as partners in patient preference studies and explained the value of involving patients at the stages of design and while conducting a patient preference study as well as at the level of communication results back to patients after. Now, the recordings are available.
Psychosocial factors might hold the key to understanding preference heterogeneity
That patients’ preferences differ is not surprising. But figuring out why is one of the main challenges of integrating the patient voice in decision-making across the medical product life cycle. Some differences might be due to clinical characteristics like age and medical history, and others to psychosocial factors like health literacy or illness perception. A recent PREFER publication underlines how measuring psychosocial factors in patient preference studies can provide valuable information to decision-makers. And provides recommendations and a checklist telling us how to do it.
Understanding unmet patient needs and expectations
Learning what patients prefer, what benefits they are after, and what risks they can and cannot tolerate is particularly important in the case of rare diseases. A recent PREFER publication reveals results from a large patient preference study targeting rare disease groups through an international collaboration between patient organisations. Focusing on the preferences of patients with Neuromuscular Disorders.
6 PhD’s furthering knowledge on patient preferences
Thanks to the efforts of six PhD students, we have been able to contribute to the science of patient preference studies beyond the scope of PREFER. In addition to their tasks in the project, they have explored PREFER research questions and methodology in their own patient preference studies, contributing valuable results to both PREFER and the preference research community. Ranging from patient preferences for gene therapy, biologics, new cancer treatments, and glucose monitoring, to how simulations can support our understanding of preferences and whether educational materials and framing of the attributes in a study will have an impact on results.
Patient preferences for treatment of neuromuscular disorders
Rare diseases are complex, uncommon, serious and debilitating conditions that often come with a poor prognosis. Neuromuscular disorders are multisystem and progressive rare diseases with few treatment options available. PREFER researchers set out to explore unmet health care needs and patient treatment preferences for two of them: myotonic dystrophy type 1 and mitochondrial myopathies. They are hoping that their findings can support decision-making in the early stages of drug development.
Time to discuss PREFER results!
We are getting close to issuing recommendations for when and how patient preferences can support decision-making for industry, regulators, health technology assessors and payers. Our clinical case studies are delivering results. And we have developed a framework for patient input to decision making that is currently under evaluation by EMA and EUnetHTA and are looking forward to a public consultation process later this summer. In the meantime, we invite everyone who is interested in patient preferences and the PREFER approach to discuss our work in a series of webinars this year, and the upcoming DIA workshop in June.
Leveraging patient preference studies for development and decision making: DIA/PREFER workshop 15-16 June
How much risk do patients find acceptable for a given benefit? Patient preferences can give us answers that can play a critical role in the development of medical treatments and throughout the lifecycle of a medical product. On June 15-16 this year, PREFER is organising a workshop together with DIA, where we will navigate through the patient preferences landscape. Starting from the PREFER project, we will explore patient involvement in patient preference studies and put the spotlight on the practical implications patient preference information can have in regulatory decision making. The workshop is open for everyone, free of charge!
Bringing patients’ views into medical approvals
Patients want to have a say in decisions that affect their health. But decision-makers have not had the tools to listen. Patient preference studies offers just that: a tool for decision-makers to collect, and for patients to give, representative and well-informed input. Karin Schölin Bywall’s dissertation reveals when and how including patient preferences in regulatory decision-making.
Miss our webinar on the value of patient preferences? Video now available!
On 26 April, the PREFER project organised the first in a series of webinars presenting and discussing results from the project. Want to know what a patient preference is? And how preferences are different from patient reported outcomes? You can now watch a recording of the presentations. The presentations covers the actors that make decisions throughout the medicinal product life cycle, and how they can benefit from patient preference studies. We also explain what we mean by patient preference sensitive situations.
PREFER newsletter out!
The PREFER project is well on the way to delivering results. We are organising a series of webinars to present and discuss results, a workshop together with DIA on patient preferences. There is also plenty of publications to look forward to. Didn't receive the newsletter today but want to be kept in the loop? Sign up!
Save the date for the DIA/PREFER patient preferences workshop 15-16 June!
Patient preferences can give us information that is critical for developing medical treatments. But they can also tell us how much risk patients think is acceptable for a given benefit. The pharmaceutical industry, regulatory authorities, HTA bodies, reimbursement agencies and patient organisations all agree that ‘patient preferences’ need to be part of decision making on benefit and risk. But how? When? And what are the regulatory requirements for preference studies? Join us online on 15-16 June to find out!
PREFER webinar 26 April on the value of patient preferences in the medical product life cycle
What is a patient preference and what is the difference between a preference and patient reported outcomes? Join us on 26 April in a webinar to listen and discuss. We will talk about the actors in the medicinal product life cycle and how they can benefit from patient preference studies, and explain what we mean by patient preference sensitive situations.
Working together to develop a preference study for treatments to reduce risk of developing RA
Figuring out what patients prefer can help inform decision making during drug development. But getting useful results requires rigorous preparation. An international team of PREFER researchers including academics, clinicians, pharmaceutical industry representatives and patient research partners have worked together to develop a preference study capable of informing decision making and also answering questions for the PREFER recommendations about the methods used to study patient preferences. In a recent BMJ Open publication, they describe how they designed their study to be informative for a wide range of stakeholders.
Do educational tools influence what patients prefer?
Stakeholders across the medical product life cycle are eager to find out what patients prefer. From the pharmaceutical companies that develop new treatments, to the authorities that decide if they should become available to patients, and at what price. But to be useful in decision-making, the patient preferences collected need to be informed. A recent Patient Education and Counseling publication explores the use of educational tools in patient preference studies, and finds that sometimes, they influence patients’ preferences.
Patient preference priorities: Questions to answer for patient-centric decision-making
Patient preference assessment is an increasingly popular approach to engaging patients in decisions across the medical product life cycle. But questions remain about how to incorporate scientifically valid preference measurements into decision-making. Especially for decisions about medical treatment, including development, regulatory and reimbursement decisions. PREFER partners have identified questions related to the knowledge gaps that are most crucial to decision-making stakeholders.
How to ask haemophilia patients about their preferences for gene therapies
Recent developments in gene therapy offer haemophilia patients the promise of permanent benefits or even a cure. But because these treatments are new, there are uncertainties about long-term efficacy and safety. This is a challenge for agencies that decide if a drug should be approved and what it should cost. PREFER researchers designed the very first patient preference study about what people with haemophilia think about gene therapies being brought to market.