Testing preference elicitation methods in clinical case studies

Our researchers will test different methods for preference elicitation in clinical case studies. We will evaluate what patients think is relevant about their disease and its impact. We will look at which treatment options they prefer and their willingness to accept trade-offs between benefits and risks of their treatment. These methods will be evaluated at different decision points in the drug development process.

We are running clinical patient preference case studies in three disease areas, involving both patient partners and clinical research partners in the PREFER project: lung cancer, rheumatoid arthritis and neuromuscular disorders. PhD students working in the project and partners from the pharmaceutical industry provide an additional eight more patient preference studies covering preferences for different kinds of treatment for haemophilia, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, multiple myeloma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic pain and myocardial infarction. We are also using eye-tracking techniques to see how patients respond to a preference study using a methodology called discrete choice experiments (DCE).

Want to learn more? have a look at our case study catalogue. And if you want to know more about how we use different terms in PREFER, have a look at our glossary. We are also making an effort to summarise case study results in plain language.

Our core case studies

The PREFER project is running three large clinical patient preference studies in three disease areas: Lung cancer, neuromuscular disorders and rheumatoid arthritis.


Case studies by PREFER partners

PREFER partners are contributing data from patient preference studies they have conducted outside the framework of the project. In addition, our PhD students are running their own preference studies as part of their thesis work. Alongside, some of the pharmaceutical companies involved in the project are doing their own studies to explore PREFER research questions. Together, these eight contributions from our partners will contribute to robust and evidence-based recommendations!


People conducting clinical case studies

Work on clinical case studies is done by researchers from universities and industry together with patient organisations and HTA bodies. We have a large group of researchers contributing to PREFER case studies, supported by patient organisations.

Our case study portfolio is big, with three core clinical patient preference case studies. PREFER partners are also contributing data from patient preference studies they have conducted outside the framework of the project. In addition, our PhD students are running their own preference studies as part of their thesis work. Alongside, some of the pharmaceutical companies involved in the project are doing their own studies to explore PREFER research questions. Together, these eight contributions from our partners will contribute to robust and evidence-based recommendations! The work is led by University Medical Centre Utrecht and Merck Sharp & Dohme together with Uppsala University and Pfizer, but we consider this a group effort!

  • Ardine de Wit, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Public lead for case studies
  • Cathy Anne Pinto, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, U.S, private lead for case studies
  • Jorien Veldwijk, Erasmus Medical Center, public co-lead for case studies
  • Leo Russo, Pfizer Worldwide Epidemiology Department, private co-lead for case studies

CLINICAL CASE STUDY LEADS

PREFER is planning three clinical patient preference case studies covering Rheumatoid Arthritis, Neuromuscular Disorders and Lung Cancer.

  • Karim Raza, University of Birmingham, Lead for rheumatoid arthrits case study
  • Larissa Valor Méndez, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Lead for Rheumatoid Arthritis case study
  • Grainne Gorman, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Lead for neuromuscular disorders case study
  • Cecilia Jimenez-Moreno, Newcastle University, Lead for neuromuscular disorders case study
  • Serena Oliveri, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Lead for lung cancer case study

PATIENT REPRESENTATIVES IN CLINCIAL CASE STUDIES WORK

The patient representation in the PREFER clincial case studies is led by Muscular Dystrophy UK (MDUK), together with the European Cancer Patients Coalition (ECPC).

  • Antonella Cardone, European Cancer Patient Coalition, ECPC
  • Charis Chirvalaki, European Cancer Patient Coalition, ECPC
  • Jenny Sharpe, MDUK

RESEARCHERS WHO ARE DOING THE WORK

  • Ulrik Kihlbom, Uppsala University
  • Karin Schölin Bywall, Uppsala University
  • Jennifer Viberg Johansson, Uppsala University
  • Karin Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Uppsala University
  • Ardine de Wit, UMC Utrecht
  • Ian Smith, UMC Utrecht
  • Esther de Bekker-Grob, Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Jorien Veldwijk, Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Bas Donkers, Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Chiara Whichello, Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Maureen Rutten-van Mölken, Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Vikas Soekhai, Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Isabelle Huys, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
  • Rosanne Janssens, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
  • Gwenda Simons, University of Birmingham
  • Karim Raza, University of Birmingham
  • Marie Falahee, University of Birmingham
  • Larissa Valormendez, University of Erlangen
  • Matthias Englbrecht, University of Erlangen
  • Ketti Mazzocco, European Institute of Oncology
  • Gabriella Praveltoni, European Institute of Oncology
  • Giulia Marton, European Institute of Oncology
  • Laura Vergani, European Institute of Oncology
  • Paolo Guiddi, European Institute of Oncology
  • Dario Monzani, European Institute of Oncology
  • Serena Oliveri, European Institute of Oncology
  • Ilaria Durosini, European Institute of Oncology
  • Geert Vander Stichele, MindBytes
  • Sarah Verschueren, MindBytes
  • Michelle Luypaert, MindBytes
  • Klevisa Ceka, European Cancer Patient Coalition
  • Aina Laura Errando, European Cancer Patient Coalition
  • Juan Jose Ventura, European Cancer Patient Coalition
  • Charis Girvalaki, European Cancer Patient Coalition
  • Cecilia Jimenez Moreno, Newcastle University
  • Grainne Gorman, Newcastle University
  • Alasdair Blain, Newcastle University
  • Albert Lim, Newcastle University
  • Christine Dyer, Newcastle University
  • Julie Murphy, Newcastle University
  • Lyndsey Butterworth, Newcastle University
  • Robert McFarland, Newcastle University
  • Irina Cleemput, Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre
  • Kate Adcock, Muscular Dystrophy UK
  • Sheila Dickinson, Novartis
  • Monika Borchert, Novartis
  • Plamen Kozlovski, Novartis
  • Florian Gutzwiller, Novartis
  • Susan Talbot, Amgen
  • Carmit Strauss, Amgen
  • Stephen Heaton, Bayer
  • Martin Gebel, Bayer
  • Agnes Pulvermüller, Bayer
  • Gunnar Brobert, Bayer
  • Inge Lise Nielsen, Bayer
  • Pooja Merchant, Bayer
  • Antje Tockhorn, Eli Lilly
  • Christine A Radawski, Eli Lilly
  • Kristin Bullok, Eli Lilly
  • Bennett Levitan, Janssen
  • Eva Katz, Janssen
  • Rachael DiSantostefano, Janssen
  • Zhong Yuan, Janssen
  • Ellen Janssen, Janssen
  • Tarek Hammad, Sanofi
  • Juhaeri Juhaeri, Sanofi
  • Vaishali Patadia, Sanofi
  • Stephanie Tcherny-Lessenot, Sanofi
  • Hilke Kracker, Actelion Pharmaceuticals
  • Leo Russo, Pfizer
  • Stephen Watt, Pfizer
  • Eline van Overbeeke, Pfizer
  • Cathy Anne Pinto, Merck, Sharpe & Dome
  • Emuella Flood, AstraZeneca
  • Heiko Götte, Merck KGaA
  • George Quartey, Roche
  • Dasha Cherepanov, Takeda
  • Kawaldip Sehmi, International Alliance of Patient Organisations
  • Sonja Potenze, International Alliance of Patient Organisations

CONTACT US

X: @IMI_PREFER

LinkedIn

YouTube

  •  
  • Disclaimer: This website and its contents reflects the PREFER project's view and not the view of IMI, the European Union or EFPIA.
  •  

PREFER

The Patient Preferences in Benefit-Risk Assessments during the Drug Life Cycle (PREFER) project has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No 115966. This Joint Undertaking receives support from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA).